FundLens
Mid Cap · head-to-head

Edelweiss Midcap vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap

Data updated · direct-growth plans · not investment advice

Edelweiss Midcap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 77/100. Edelweiss Midcap has the weaker risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.36 vs 1.53), 3-year returns of 23.0% vs 24.1%, and an expense ratio of 0.71% vs 0.95%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Portfolio overlap

lower = better diversification
Edelweiss Midcap × WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap10.1%

Overlap = combined weight of stocks both funds hold (sum of the smaller weight per shared stock), from each fund's latest disclosed top-25 holdings.

Returns
1Y return
13.5%
20.0%BEST
3Y return
23.0%
24.1%BEST
5Y return
20.5%
3Y vs index· vs own category index
+5.1%
+6.2%BEST
Risk
Sharpe· ↑ better
1.05
1.12BEST
Sortino· ↑ better
1.36
1.53BEST
Std deviation· ↓ better
17.82
17.25BEST
Alpha· ↑ better
3.24
4.34BEST
Beta· ≈1 market-like
0.92
0.89
Cost & facts
Expense· ↓ better
0.71%BEST
0.95%
P/E· ↓ cheaper
31.8BEST
31.9
AUM
₹18.7k CrBEST
₹6.8k Cr
VR rating
★★★★★
★★★★★
Morningstar
Start date
01 Jan 2013
07 Sept 2022

Quick answers

Is Edelweiss Midcap better than WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap?

Edelweiss Midcap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 77/100. Edelweiss Midcap has the weaker risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.36 vs 1.53), 3-year returns of 23.0% vs 24.1%, and an expense ratio of 0.71% vs 0.95%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Which is cheaper — Edelweiss Midcap or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap?

Edelweiss Midcap has the lower expense ratio: 0.71% vs 0.95% (direct plans). Lower fees compound in your favour over long holding periods.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

On the Sortino ratio (return per unit of downside risk), WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap leads with 1.53 vs 1.36. Sharpe ratios: Edelweiss Midcap 1.05, WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap 1.12.