FundLens
Mid Cap · head-to-head

Helios Mid Cap vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap

Data updated · direct-growth plans · not investment advice

Helios Mid Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 76/100. Helios Mid Cap has the stronger risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.76 vs 1.52), 3-year returns of — vs 24.1%, and an expense ratio of 0.78% vs 0.99%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Returns
1Y return
12.9%BEST
12.9%
3Y return
24.1%
5Y return
3Y vs index· vs own category index
+5.1%
Risk
Sharpe· ↑ better
1.21BEST
1.12
Sortino· ↑ better
1.76BEST
1.52
Std deviation· ↓ better
16.54BEST
17.25
Alpha· ↑ better
5.35BEST
4.34
Beta· ≈1 market-like
0.93
0.89
Cost & facts
Expense· ↓ better
0.78%BEST
0.99%
P/E· ↓ cheaper
40.9
30.3BEST
AUM
₹1.8k Cr
₹6.2k CrBEST
VR rating
★★★★★
Morningstar
★★★★★
Start date
13 Mar 2025
07 Sept 2022

Quick answers

Is Helios Mid Cap better than WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap?

Helios Mid Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 76/100. Helios Mid Cap has the stronger risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.76 vs 1.52), 3-year returns of — vs 24.1%, and an expense ratio of 0.78% vs 0.99%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Which is cheaper — Helios Mid Cap or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap?

Helios Mid Cap has the lower expense ratio: 0.78% vs 0.99% (direct plans). Lower fees compound in your favour over long holding periods.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

On the Sortino ratio (return per unit of downside risk), Helios Mid Cap leads with 1.76 vs 1.52. Sharpe ratios: Helios Mid Cap 1.21, WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap 1.12.