FundLens
Large Cap · head-to-head

Nippon India Large Cap vs WhiteOak Capital Large Cap

Data updated · direct-growth plans · not investment advice

Nippon India Large Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 77/100. Nippon India Large Cap has the weaker risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 0.70 vs 0.84), 3-year returns of 13.0% vs 14.7%, and an expense ratio of 0.92% vs 0.95%. Scores are relative to all Large Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Returns
1Y return
-0.3%
2.0%BEST
3Y return
13.0%
14.7%BEST
5Y return
16.3%
3Y vs index· vs own category index
+4.9%
+6.6%BEST
Risk
Sharpe· ↑ better
0.67
0.70BEST
Sortino· ↑ better
0.70
0.84BEST
Std deviation· ↓ better
14.17
13.61BEST
Alpha· ↑ better
3.15
3.35BEST
Beta· ≈1 market-like
0.95
0.91
Cost & facts
Expense· ↓ better
0.92%BEST
0.95%
P/E· ↓ cheaper
24.7
24.6BEST
AUM
₹53.2k CrBEST
₹1.2k Cr
VR rating
★★★★★BEST
★★★★
Morningstar
★★★★★BEST
★★★★
Start date
01 Jan 2013
01 Dec 2022

Quick answers

Is Nippon India Large Cap better than WhiteOak Capital Large Cap?

Nippon India Large Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 77/100. Nippon India Large Cap has the weaker risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 0.70 vs 0.84), 3-year returns of 13.0% vs 14.7%, and an expense ratio of 0.92% vs 0.95%. Scores are relative to all Large Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Which is cheaper — Nippon India Large Cap or WhiteOak Capital Large Cap?

Nippon India Large Cap has the lower expense ratio: 0.92% vs 0.95% (direct plans). Lower fees compound in your favour over long holding periods.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

On the Sortino ratio (return per unit of downside risk), WhiteOak Capital Large Cap leads with 0.84 vs 0.70. Sharpe ratios: Nippon India Large Cap 0.67, WhiteOak Capital Large Cap 0.70.