FundLens
Large Cap · head-to-head

WhiteOak Capital Large Cap vs Nippon India Large Cap

Data updated · direct-growth plans · not investment advice

WhiteOak Capital Large Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 78/100. WhiteOak Capital Large Cap has the stronger risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 0.82 vs 0.62), 3-year returns of 14.4% vs 12.6%, and an expense ratio of 0.95% vs 0.92%. Scores are relative to all Large Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Returns
1Y return
0.9%BEST
-1.2%
3Y return
14.4%BEST
12.6%
5Y return
15.8%
3Y vs index· vs own category index
+6.6%BEST
+4.8%
Risk
Sharpe· ↑ better
0.70BEST
0.67
Sortino· ↑ better
0.82BEST
0.62
Std deviation· ↓ better
13.61BEST
14.17
Alpha· ↑ better
3.35BEST
3.15
Beta· ≈1 market-like
0.91
0.95
Cost & facts
Expense· ↓ better
0.95%
0.92%BEST
P/E· ↓ cheaper
24.6BEST
24.7
AUM
₹1.2k Cr
₹53.2k CrBEST
VR rating
★★★★
★★★★★BEST
Morningstar
★★★★
★★★★★BEST
Start date
01 Dec 2022
01 Jan 2013

Quick answers

Is WhiteOak Capital Large Cap better than Nippon India Large Cap?

WhiteOak Capital Large Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 78/100. WhiteOak Capital Large Cap has the stronger risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 0.82 vs 0.62), 3-year returns of 14.4% vs 12.6%, and an expense ratio of 0.95% vs 0.92%. Scores are relative to all Large Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Which is cheaper — WhiteOak Capital Large Cap or Nippon India Large Cap?

Nippon India Large Cap has the lower expense ratio: 0.92% vs 0.95% (direct plans). Lower fees compound in your favour over long holding periods.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

On the Sortino ratio (return per unit of downside risk), WhiteOak Capital Large Cap leads with 0.82 vs 0.62. Sharpe ratios: WhiteOak Capital Large Cap 0.70, Nippon India Large Cap 0.67.