FundLens
Mid Cap · head-to-head

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap vs Helios Mid Cap

Data updated · direct-growth plans · not investment advice

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 74/100. WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the weaker risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.30 vs 1.64), 3-year returns of 21.6% vs —, and an expense ratio of 0.97% vs 1.00%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Portfolio overlap

lower = better diversification
WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap × Helios Mid Cap12.6%

Overlap = combined weight of stocks both funds hold (sum of the smaller weight per shared stock), from each fund's latest disclosed top-25 holdings.

Returns
1Y return
12.8%BEST
11.9%
3Y return
21.6%
—
5Y return
—
—
3Y vs index· vs own category index
+6.6%
—
Risk
Sharpe· ↑ better
1.03
1.13BEST
Sortino· ↑ better
1.30
1.64BEST
Std deviation· ↓ better
16.94
16.16BEST
Alpha· ↑ better
5.71
7.58BEST
Beta· ≈1 market-like
0.89
0.94
Cost & facts
Expense· ↓ better
0.97%BEST
1.00%
P/E· ↓ cheaper
31.9BEST
47.4
AUM
₹7.5k CrBEST
₹2.2k Cr
VR rating
★★★★★
—
Morningstar
★★★★★
—
Start date
07 Sept 2022
13 Mar 2025

Quick answers

Is WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap better than Helios Mid Cap?

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 74/100. WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the weaker risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.30 vs 1.64), 3-year returns of 21.6% vs —, and an expense ratio of 0.97% vs 1.00%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Which is cheaper — WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap or Helios Mid Cap?

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the lower expense ratio: 0.97% vs 1.00% (direct plans). Lower fees compound in your favour over long holding periods.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

On the Sortino ratio (return per unit of downside risk), Helios Mid Cap leads with 1.64 vs 1.30. Sharpe ratios: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap 1.03, Helios Mid Cap 1.13.