FundLens
Mid Cap · head-to-head

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap vs Helios Mid Cap

Data updated · direct-growth plans · not investment advice

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 77/100 vs 77/100. WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the weaker risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.54 vs 1.83), 3-year returns of 24.5% vs —, and an expense ratio of 0.99% vs 0.78%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Returns
1Y return
14.0%BEST
13.9%
3Y return
24.5%
5Y return
3Y vs index· vs own category index
+5.1%
Risk
Sharpe· ↑ better
1.12
1.26BEST
Sortino· ↑ better
1.54
1.83BEST
Std deviation· ↓ better
17.25
16.59BEST
Alpha· ↑ better
4.34
5.90BEST
Beta· ≈1 market-like
0.89
0.93
Cost & facts
Expense· ↓ better
0.99%
0.78%BEST
P/E· ↓ cheaper
30.3BEST
40.9
AUM
₹6.2k CrBEST
₹1.8k Cr
VR rating
★★★★★
Morningstar
★★★★★
Start date
07 Sept 2022
13 Mar 2025

Quick answers

Is WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap better than Helios Mid Cap?

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 77/100 vs 77/100. WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the weaker risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.54 vs 1.83), 3-year returns of 24.5% vs —, and an expense ratio of 0.99% vs 0.78%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Which is cheaper — WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap or Helios Mid Cap?

Helios Mid Cap has the lower expense ratio: 0.78% vs 0.99% (direct plans). Lower fees compound in your favour over long holding periods.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

On the Sortino ratio (return per unit of downside risk), Helios Mid Cap leads with 1.83 vs 1.54. Sharpe ratios: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap 1.12, Helios Mid Cap 1.26.