FundLens
Mid Cap · head-to-head

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap vs HSBC Midcap

Data updated · direct-growth plans · not investment advice

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 76/100. WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the stronger risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.18 vs 1.13), 3-year returns of 20.4% vs 22.4%, and an expense ratio of 0.95% vs 1.15%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Portfolio overlap

lower = better diversification
WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap × HSBC Midcap7.9%

Overlap = combined weight of stocks both funds hold (sum of the smaller weight per shared stock), from each fund's latest disclosed top-25 holdings.

Returns
1Y return
9.7%
14.9%BEST
3Y return
20.4%
22.4%BEST
5Y return
—
17.0%
3Y vs index· vs own category index
+7.0%
+9.0%BEST
Risk
Sharpe· ↑ better
0.85BEST
0.82
Sortino· ↑ better
1.18BEST
1.13
Std deviation· ↓ better
17.55BEST
20.71
Alpha· ↑ better
5.98
6.84BEST
Beta· ≈1 market-like
0.90
1.03
Cost & facts
Expense· ↓ better
0.95%BEST
1.15%
P/E· ↓ cheaper
30.4BEST
33.1
AUM
₹7.5k Cr
₹16.8k CrBEST
VR rating
★★★★★
★★★★★
Morningstar
★★★★★BEST
★★★★★
Start date
07 Sept 2022
01 Jan 2013

Quick answers

Is WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap better than HSBC Midcap?

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 78/100 vs 76/100. WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the stronger risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.18 vs 1.13), 3-year returns of 20.4% vs 22.4%, and an expense ratio of 0.95% vs 1.15%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Which is cheaper — WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap or HSBC Midcap?

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the lower expense ratio: 0.95% vs 1.15% (direct plans). Lower fees compound in your favour over long holding periods.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

On the Sortino ratio (return per unit of downside risk), WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap leads with 1.18 vs 1.13. Sharpe ratios: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap 0.85, HSBC Midcap 0.82.