FundLens
Mid Cap · head-to-head

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap vs HSBC Midcap

Data updated · direct-growth plans · not investment advice

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 77/100 vs 75/100. WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the stronger risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.52 vs 1.45), 3-year returns of 24.2% vs 26.4%, and an expense ratio of 0.95% vs 1.22%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Portfolio overlap

lower = better diversification
WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap × HSBC Midcap5%

Overlap = combined weight of stocks both funds hold (sum of the smaller weight per shared stock), from each fund's latest disclosed top-25 holdings.

Returns
1Y return
18.6%
24.9%BEST
3Y return
24.2%
26.4%BEST
5Y return
20.8%
3Y vs index· vs own category index
+6.1%
+8.3%BEST
Risk
Sharpe· ↑ better
1.12BEST
1.09
Sortino· ↑ better
1.52BEST
1.45
Std deviation· ↓ better
17.25BEST
20.02
Alpha· ↑ better
4.34
4.75BEST
Beta· ≈1 market-like
0.89
1.01
Cost & facts
Expense· ↓ better
0.95%BEST
1.22%
P/E· ↓ cheaper
31.9
31.6BEST
AUM
₹6.8k Cr
₹15.6k CrBEST
VR rating
★★★★★BEST
★★★★
Morningstar
★★★★★BEST
★★★★
Start date
07 Sept 2022
01 Jan 2013

Quick answers

Is WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap better than HSBC Midcap?

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 77/100 vs 75/100. WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the stronger risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.52 vs 1.45), 3-year returns of 24.2% vs 26.4%, and an expense ratio of 0.95% vs 1.22%. Scores are relative to all Mid Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Which is cheaper — WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap or HSBC Midcap?

WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap has the lower expense ratio: 0.95% vs 1.22% (direct plans). Lower fees compound in your favour over long holding periods.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

On the Sortino ratio (return per unit of downside risk), WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap leads with 1.52 vs 1.45. Sharpe ratios: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap 1.12, HSBC Midcap 1.09.