FundLens
Multi Cap · head-to-head

WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap vs LIC MF Multi Cap

Data updated · direct-growth plans · not investment advice

WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 77/100 vs 69/100. WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap has the stronger risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.03 vs 0.90), 3-year returns of 17.6% vs 16.8%, and an expense ratio of 0.89% vs 0.78%. Scores are relative to all Multi Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Portfolio overlap

lower = better diversification
WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap × LIC MF Multi Cap8.8%

Overlap = combined weight of stocks both funds hold (sum of the smaller weight per shared stock), from each fund's latest disclosed top-25 holdings.

Returns
1Y return
-0.4%
1.3%BEST
3Y return
17.6%BEST
16.8%
5Y return
—
—
3Y vs index· vs own category index
+7.8%BEST
+7.0%
Risk
Sharpe· ↑ better
0.77BEST
0.68
Sortino· ↑ better
1.03BEST
0.90
Std deviation· ↓ better
15.71BEST
18.16
Alpha· ↑ better
5.90BEST
5.20
Beta· ≈1 market-like
0.89
1.01
Cost & facts
Expense· ↓ better
0.89%
0.78%BEST
P/E· ↓ cheaper
26.2BEST
30.7
AUM
₹4.3k CrBEST
₹2.2k Cr
VR rating
★★★★★
★★★★★
Morningstar
★★★★★
★★★★★
Start date
22 Sept 2023
31 Oct 2022

Quick answers

Is WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap better than LIC MF Multi Cap?

WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap currently edges it with a Smart Score of 77/100 vs 69/100. WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap has the stronger risk-adjusted profile (Sortino 1.03 vs 0.90), 3-year returns of 17.6% vs 16.8%, and an expense ratio of 0.89% vs 0.78%. Scores are relative to all Multi Cap peers and refresh with every data update.

Which is cheaper — WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap or LIC MF Multi Cap?

LIC MF Multi Cap has the lower expense ratio: 0.78% vs 0.89% (direct plans). Lower fees compound in your favour over long holding periods.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

On the Sortino ratio (return per unit of downside risk), WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap leads with 1.03 vs 0.90. Sharpe ratios: WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap 0.77, LIC MF Multi Cap 0.68.